Sample report
See what timestamped feedback can look like.
This public sample page shows the value of the report before a student pays or uploads a full recording.
Anatomy of a review
Timestamped judgement, not vague comments.
Every review is anchored to a timestamp, a musical dimension, and a severity. You leave knowing exactly what to fix first, and whether to submit or re-record.
- —Piece-by-piece and moment-by-moment comments
- —Cautious estimated score range, clearly disclaimed
- —Prioritised next steps, not a wall of feedback
- 02:14Review noteaccent
Intonation is sharp in the shift into third position. Slow practice with a drone should come before another full take.
- 04:52Review noteprimary
The second subject has lovely shape. Keep the tempo steadier through the transition into the new character.
- 08:10Review notedanger
Memory insecurity at bar 45 creates submission risk. Rerecording is recommended after targeted sectional work.
Score estimate
Example outcome.
Estimated score
126-130
Cautious merit to distinction border.
Recommendation
Rerecord
One memory risk should be fixed first.
Priority
Rhythm
Stabilise tempo before final take.
Piece-by-piece
Summary table scaffold.
| Piece | Strength | Risk | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Piece A | Clear phrasing | Tempo drift | Metronome subdivisions |
| Piece B | Good tone | Shift intonation | Slow drone practice |
| Piece C | Characterful opening | Memory slip | Rerecord after sectional work |